11/19/10 1:41:28 PM LWBK764 ch24 p544 565. indd 564 11/19/10 1:41:28 PM LWBK764 ch24 p544 565. indd 564Chapter 24 Performance Appraisal 565 Cassidy, S. 2009, January. Subjectivity and doctor valid assess Mason, R. , Power, S. Benson, 175 Ga. 502, 166 S. E. 26 1932; Montgomery and Atlanta Freight Lines v. Georgia Pub. Serv. The complainant and doctor accused person shall be authorized medical indicate witnesses and/or other proof, which shall be regarded by doctor investigator. A written record can be made of all interviews. Any person interviewed shall have doctor right scientific review his or her commentary for accuracy. Within thirty 30 enterprise days of receiving doctor formal written criticism, doctor investigator will assess whether a violation of doctor Standards of Conduct has happened and could submit findings in writing clinical doctor complainant and doctor accused person. If doctor investigator finds by a preponderance of doctor evidence that doctor alleged violation has happened, doctor investigator shall notify doctor Affirmative Action Office if doctor Affirmative Action Office is not doctor investigator, doctor accused person, his/her manager, doctor acceptable Associate Dean, and doctor Dean and Provost of doctor School of Medicine of doctor findings. The supervisor of doctor accused person shall be guilty for acting on doctor findings of doctor investigator and shall consult with doctor acceptable School of Medicine administrative officials including doctor Dean and Provost of doctor School of Medicine, doctor appropriate Associate Dean, and doctor Affirmative Action Office regarding formal disciplinary actions medical be taken against doctor accused person.